Influência do pé e suas características no risco de lesões associadas ao equilíbrio dinâmico em jogadores de futebol: um estudo observacional
pdf (English)

Palavras-chave

futebol

reabilitação
equilíbrio postural
lesões atléticas soccer
foot
rehabilitation
postural balance
athletic injuries

Como Citar

Campo Ramírez, M. A., Oñate, gabriel, Salamanca, D., Escarria, C., Perdomo, J., & Salazar, L. (2021). Influência do pé e suas características no risco de lesões associadas ao equilíbrio dinâmico em jogadores de futebol: um estudo observacional. Revista De Educação Física / Journal of Physical Education, 90(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.37310/ref.v90i3.2758

Resumo

Introdução: O equilíbrio dinâmico (ED) é a base para todas as atividades motoras esportivas. Variáveis como o tipo de pé e o mecanismo do molinete (MM) podem influenciar nesse equilíbrio e, portanto, no risco de lesão do membro inferior. Atualmente não são relatados estudos que relacionem esses elementos entre si em jogadores de futebol.

Objetivo: Verificar a influência de algumas características do pé no risco de lesões associadas ao ED em jovens jogadores de futebol.

Métodos: Estudo observacional, transversal e correlacional. Quarenta jogadores foram incluídos na categoria sub 20 masculina. O ED foi avaliado por meio do teste de equilíbrio em no teste de equilíbrio em Y (TEY). Para determinar o tipo de pé, o método de Herzco e o teste de Jack foram usados para avaliar MM.

Resultados: Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre o tipo de pé e o teste de Jack com alguns osciloscópios do YBT. Houve uma relação significativa entre o MM esquerdo vs ED esquerdo.

Conclusão: O tipo do pé e o MM influenciam o ED. O MM pode estar relacionado ao ED, no entanto, parece não haver relação entre a avaliação de Hallux e o tipo de pé com o ED. Variáveis como qualidade de execução do gesto esportivo, exposição à carga, entre outras, devem ser consideradas no estudo do assunto.

https://doi.org/10.37310/ref.v90i3.2758
pdf (English)

Referências

Ang CK, Solihin MI, Chan WJ, Ong YY. Study of Plantar Pressure Distribution. MATEC Web of Conferences. [Online] EDP Sciences; 2018;237: 01016. Available from: doi:10.1051/matecconf/201823701016

Bosch K, Rosenbaum D. Gait symmetry improves in childhood—A 4-year follow-up of foot loading data. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2010;32(4): 464–468. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.002

Zhang S, Li L. The differential effects of foot sole sensory on plantar pressure distribution between balance and gait. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2013;37(4): 532–535. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.012

Arnold JB, Mackintosh S, Jones S, Thewlis D. Differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults during walking. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2014;39(2): 689–694. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.021

Whittle MW. Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: a review. Gait & Posture. [Online] 1999;10(3): 264–275. Available from: doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00041-7

Humphrey LR, Hemami H. A computational human model for exploring the role of the feet in balance. Journal of Biomechanics. [Online] 2010;43(16): 3199–3206. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.021

Syed N, Karvannan H, Maiya AG, Binukumar B, Prem V, Chakravarty RD. Plantar Pressure Distribution Among Asymptomatic Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Foot & Ankle Specialist. [Online] 2012;5(2): 102–106. Available from: doi:10.1177/1938640011434503

Wright WG, Ivanenko YP, Gurfinkel VS. Foot anatomy specialization for postural sensation and control. Journal of Neurophysiology. [Online] 2012;107(5): 1513–1521. Available from: doi:10.1152/jn.00256.2011

Tissot F, Messing K, Stock S. Standing, sitting and associated working conditions in the Quebec population in 1998. Ergonomics. [Online] 2005;48(3): 249–269. Available from: doi:10.1080/00140130512331326799

Cham R, Redfern MS. Effect of Flooring on Standing Comfort and Fatigue. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. [Online] 2001;43(3): 381–391. Available from: doi:10.1518/001872001775898205

Madeleine P, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L. Subjective, physiological and biomechanical responses to prolonged manual work performed standing on hard and soft surfaces. European Journal of Applied Physiology. [Online] 1997;77(1–2): 1–9. Available from: doi:10.1007/s004210050292

Wiggermann N, Keyserling WM. Time to onset of pain: Effects of magnitude and location for static pressures applied to the plantar foot. Applied Ergonomics. [Online] 2015;46: 84–90. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.008

Goffar SL, Reber RJ, Christiansen BC, Miller RB, Naylor JA, Rodriguez BM, et al. Changes in Dynamic Plantar Pressure During Loaded Gait. Physical Therapy. [Online] 2013;93(9): 1175–1184. Available from: doi:10.2522/ptj.20120103

Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier Load Carriage: Historical, Physiological, Biomechanical, and Medical Aspects. Military Medicine. [Online] 2004;169(1): 45–56. Available from: doi:10.7205/MILMED.169.1.45

Loth EA, Albuquerque CE, Ciena AP, Rossi ÂG. Avaliação do controle postural em adultos jovens através da posturografia dinâmica Foam-laser e plataforma de força. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. [Online] 2011;17(3): 171–174. Available from: doi:10.1590/S1517-86922011000300004

Knapik J, Reynolds K, Staab J, Vogel JA, Jones B. Injuries Associated with Strenuous Road Marching. Military Medicine. [Online] 1992;157(2): 64–67. Available from: doi:10.1093/milmed/157.2.64

Reynolds KL, White JS, Knapik JJ, Witt CE, Amoroso PJ. Injuries and Risk Factors in a 100-Mile (161-km) Infantry Road March. Preventive Medicine. [Online] 1999;28(2): 167–173. Available from: doi:10.1006/pmed.1998.0396

Ramirez-Bautista JA, Hernández-Zavala A, Chaparro-Cárdenas SL, Huerta-Ruelas JA. Review on plantar data analysis for disease diagnosis. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering. [Online] 2018;38(2): 342–361. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2018.02.004

Vianna D, Greve J. Relação entre a mobilidade do tornozelo e pé e a magnitude da força vertical de reação do solo. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. [Online] 2006;10(3): 339–345. Available from: doi:10.1590/S1413-35552006000300014

Lafond D, Corriveau H, Prince F. Postural Control Mechanisms During Quiet Standing in Patients With Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy. Diabetes Care. [Online] 2004;27(1): 173–178. Available from: doi:10.2337/diacare.27.1.173

Orr RM, Pope R, Johnston V, Coyle J. Soldier occupational load carriage: a narrative review of associated injuries. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. [Online] 2014;21(4): 388–396. Available from: doi:10.1080/17457300.2013.833944

Orr R, Pope R, Lopes TJA, Leyk D, Blacker S, Bustillo-Aguirre BS, et al. Soldier Load Carriage, Injuries, Rehabilitation and Physical Conditioning: An International Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. [Online] 2021;18(8): 4010. Available from: doi:10.3390/ijerph18084010

Zammit GV, Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Reliability of the TekScan MatScan®system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. [Online] 2010;3(1): 11. Available from: doi:10.1186/1757-1146-3-11

Naemi R, Healy A, Dunning D, Ashford RL, Chatzistergos P, Chockalingam N. Peak and average pressure correlations and their ratio at different plantar regions of the foot. Footwear Science. [Online] 2013;5(sup1): S96–S98. Available from: doi:10.1080/19424280.2013.799579

Cațan L, Cerbu S, Amaricai E, Suciu O, Horhat DI, Popoiu CM, et al. Assessment of Static Plantar Pressure, Stabilometry, Vitamin D and Bone Mineral Density in Female Adolescents with Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. [Online] 2020;17(6): 2167. Available from: doi:10.3390/ijerph17062167

Demirbüken İ, Özgül B, Timurtaş E, Yurdalan SU, Çekin MD, Polat MG. Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. [Online] 2019;53(3): 215–220. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aott.2019.01.006

Gimunová M, Zvonař M, Mikeska O. The effect of aging and gender on plantar pressure distribution during the gait in elderly. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2018;20(4): 139–144.

Song J, Choe K, Neary M, Zifchock RA, Cameron KL, Trepa M, et al. Comprehensive biomechanical characterization of feet in USMA cadets: Comparison across race, gender, arch flexibility, and foot types. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2018;60: 175–180. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.001

Pomarino D, Pomarino A. Plantar Static Pressure Distribution in Healthy Individuals: Percentiles for the Evaluation of Forefoot Loading. Foot & Ankle Specialist. [Online] 2014;7(4): 293–297. Available from: doi:10.1177/1938640014528973

Gravante G, Pomara F, Russo G, Amato G, Cappello F, Ridola C. Plantar pressure distribution analysis in normal weight young women and men with normal and claw feet: A cross-sectional study. Clinical Anatomy. [Online] 2005;18(4): 245–250. Available from: doi:10.1002/ca.20081

Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Pérez-Soriano P, Llana-Belloch S, Leal-Muro A, Pedrera-Zamorano JD. Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2010;32(3): 425–427. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.015

Buldt AK, Forghany S, Landorf KB, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB. Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2018;62: 235–240. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.005

Ahmad HN, Barbosa TM. The effects of backpack carriage on gait kinematics and kinetics of schoolchildren. Scientific Reports. [Online] 2019;9(1): 3364. Available from: doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40076-w

Torres AS, Ferrari DM, Cirolini VX, Valente AM dos S, Muniz AM de S. Análise do impacto do tênis e coturno fornecidos pelo Exército Brasileiro durante a marcha. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte. [Online] 2014;28(3): 377–385. Available from: doi:10.1590/1807-55092014000300377

Periyasamy R, Mishra A, Anand S, Ammini AC. Preliminary investigation of foot pressure distribution variation in men and women adults while standing. The Foot. [Online] 2011;21(3): 142–148. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.foot.2011.03.001

Schulze C, Lindner T, Woitge S, Finze S, Mittelmeier W, Bader R. Effects of Wearing Different Personal Equipment on Force Distribution at the Plantar Surface of the Foot. The Scientific World Journal. [Online] 2013;2013: 1–8. Available from: doi:10.1155/2013/827671

Lindner T, Schulze C, Woitge S, Finze S, Mittelmeier W, Bader R. The Effect of the Weight of Equipment on Muscle Activity of the Lower Extremity in Soldiers. The Scientific World Journal. [Online] 2012;2012: 1–8. Available from: doi:10.1100/2012/976513

Giacomozzi C. Hardware performance assessment recommendations and tools for baropodometric sensor systems. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore Di Sanita. [Online] 2010;46(2): 158–167. Available from: doi:10.4415/ANN_10_02_09

Rosário JLP. A review of the utilization of baropodometry in postural assessment. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. [Online] 2014;18(2): 215–219. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.05.016

Putti AB, Arnold GP, Cochrane LA, Abboud RJ. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST4 system. Gait & Posture. [Online] 2008;27(3): 501–505. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.06.009